In the case of evidence-based environmental management, stakeholders are defined as “all individuals and organisations that might have a stake in the findings of the review” (ibid., p. The results from systematic reviews and systematic maps are commonly communicated to stakeholders through formats such as final reports, policy briefs and summaries. Therefore, effective science communication is considered to be an important foundation for evidence-based decision-making. This poses the risk that the audience, particularly the non-expert one, might make inaccurate assumptions when they try to make sense of new information. Traditionally, scientific knowledge has been communicated as isolated logical ideas with limited context given to the target audience. The issues at stake in environmental management and conservation are often complex, while communication of systematic reviews and systematic maps needs to be clear and comprehensible (for definitions of and differences between systematic review and mapping methodologies, see e.g. It is time for researchers and research networks such as the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence to support and emphasize the importance of exploring new tools for effective science communication, such as storytelling. The paper concludes that storytelling holds untapped potential for communicating evidence from systematic reviews and maps for increased stakeholder engagement. This approach can increase their engagement with the science and the implementation of evidence-based decisions. ![]() Second, creating a final story that faithfully presents the review results, while also relating to the contextual narratives, can contribute to effective communication of the results to stakeholders as well as to a broader audience. Here, we refer to contextual narratives as stories gathered from stakeholders to gain an understanding of their perspective. First, collecting contextual narratives from stakeholders at the stages of question formulation and protocol writing can help to inform and generate relevant research questions and review designs. Here, we argue that storytelling holds potential as a tool in systematic reviews and systematic maps, serving mainly two purposes. Being easily digested by the human brain, stories help bridging between our logos and pathos when an audience becomes emotionally receptive of facts, chances increase that they will respond and act on the knowledge. But an increasing number of studies are showing how narratives can be useful for developing trust with an audience and increasing knowledge retention as well as the ability and willingness by audiences to learn and take action. Using storytelling to explain complex research has, in the past, not been considered a rigorous method of communicating science. In this commentary paper, we present a framework for the integration of storytelling in systematic reviews and systematic maps at the stages where stakeholders are actively involved. It is a well-known and powerful means of communicating messages and engaging audiences. ![]() ![]() Storytelling is a two-way interaction, written or oral, between someone telling a story and one or more listeners.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |